1. Please list the courses you taught in the each of the Spring 2011 and Fall 2011 semesters and your average “Overall” SCATE score.
a. Name of Course:
Average “Overall” SCATE score:
b. Name of Course:
Average “Overall” SCATE score:
c. Name of Course:
Average “Overall” SCATE score:
d. Name of Course:
Average “Overall” SCATE score:
2. Considering your teaching in aggregate in 2011, how do you self-assess your teaching in each course? (select one for each course)
a. Name of course:
Self-rating:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
b. Name of course:
Self-rating:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
c. Name of course:
Self-rating:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
d. Name of course:
Self-rating:
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Please comment on your teaching self-assessment in the space provided. If your average overall SCATE score for any class was below a 3.0, please explain why that was and what steps you are taking to address that feedback.
3. How can the Law School better support your teaching?
4. Please list, with complete citations (and reference to electronic sources, where possible), the books, law review articles or book chapters you actually published in 2011.
5. Please list any other writings (magazine articles, bar journal publications, op-ed pieces, etc.) actually published in 2011.
6. Please list your current works-in-progress, including working papers (with links to SSRN, if available).
7. If you have not published a book, law review article or book chapter in the last two calendar years, please explain why that is and what plans you have for scholarly publications.
8. In what direction(s) do you see your scholarship moving in the next year? The next 5 years? How can the Law School better support your scholarship? Please comment in the space provided:
9. Please list up to five significant service projects undertaken at or on behalf of the Law School, University and/or outside community in 2011.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
10. Considering your service to the Law School (only) in 2011, how do you think your peers would evaluate your service?
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
11. Considering your service to the Law School (only) in 2011, how do you evaluate your service?
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
12. Please comment on the difference, if any, between the responses to Questions 10 and 11.
13. On April 18, 2007, the faculty voted to adopt “Pace Law School Faculty’s Expectations of its Members” (see Faculty Handbook pp. FH-114 to FH-115). For each expectation reprinted below, please indicate by checking the appropriate column whether you believe you met that expectation in 2011.
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
a. Aspiring to teach with excellence
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
b. Mastering the doctrines and theories of the subjects taught
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
c. Preparing for each course taught, including development of the objectives, coverage and requirements of the course, identification of the teaching methods and materials to be used, and the preparation of an adequate syllabus for the course
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
d. Preparing for each class, including a mastery of the material to be covered, identification of the objectives for the class and methods to achieve them, and identification of useful teaching aides to educate the material
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
e. Being accessible to students, normally demonstrated by establishing a regular and predictable physical presence on campus, promptly responding to students’ email messages and requests for meetings, and by being regularly visible and available at the Law School
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
f. Preparing examinations that fairly test students on matters and materials covered in the course
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
g. Grading examinations anonymously and in a timely manner, with as much objectivity as possible, including the use of grading grids
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
h. Grading papers, simulations, experiential placements, and other non-anonymous
work in a timely manner, with as much objectivity as possible
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
i. Providing students with feedback on graded work, explaining the grade and how it could have been improved, including sample answers, written comments and the opportunity to confer in person with the professor
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
j. Encouraging students to participate in the non-classroom academic life of the school by being conspicuous presences in such life
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
k. Counseling and mentoring students in all aspects of law school and the legal profession
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
l. Being role models for aspiring members of the legal profession
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
m. Mentoring other faculty members, particularly newer professors, to become good
teachers
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
n. Publishing scholarly articles in law reviews and other scholarly journals, normally at least one such article or its equivalent every other year or books published by scholarly presses at greater intervals
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
o. Participating in scholarly colloquia and symposia and making scholarly
presentations
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
p. Mentoring other faculty members, particularly newer professors, in developing scholarly and research agendas and in writing scholarly papers
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
q. Engage in non-scholarly activities in the areas of their scholarly activities, such as op-ed pieces, articles in popular magazines, and media interviews
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
r. Performing committee and other assignments effectively and in a timely manner
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
s. Active participation in advising student organizations and activities
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
t. Participating effectively in the recruitment, conversion, and retention of students; and recruitment and appointment of new faculty members
I did not meet this expectation
I partially met this expectation
I met this expectation
u. Participating in University committees and activities; and participating in the life of the legal and public communities on a local, state, national or international level
14. If you checked either the “I did not meet this expectation” or “I partially met this expectation” for any item in Question 13, please identify the item by letter and comment on your response.
15. Thinking ahead, are there particular service activities in which you would like to participate or leadership roles you would like to assume at the Law School? What are your professional goals in 2012? Is there anything else you would like to bring to the Dean’s attention?
ON THE NEXT PAGE YOU WILL BE ABLE TO PRINT OUT YOUR SUBMISSION.
ON THE NEXT PAGE YOU WILL BE ABLE TO PRINT OUT YOUR SUBMISSION.